[support] Problem in using racoon in the live CD

[Romain KUNTZ]

Hi,

You may find some pieces of information on this page:
http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/

Regards,
romain

On 2008/12/26, at 3:11, liu jianwei wrote:

> Dose CN support IPSec now (for any edition of mip6d)?
> Can I use IPSec policy in the mip6d.conf like that in HA?
> if not, could anyone give me some hints on the implementation of this?
> by the way, is there any documentation introducing all the available
> options in the IPSec policy section of mip6d.conf (and the
> grammar,such as UseESP, UseAH? Can Mh and TunnelMh use together?).
>
> 2008/5/4 liu jianwei <ljw725 at gmail.com>:
>> In your previous mail you wrote:
>> but some knew where to find it
>> =>Where could I find it? :)
>>
>>
>> 2008/5/1, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr>:
>>>
>>> In your previous mail you wrote:
>>>
>>>> I read from the Readme.IPsec that
>>>  "(2) IPsec between the MN and CN -- Currently, use of IPsec  
>>> between MN
>>>      and CN is not supported."
>>>  Is this feature supported by the Live CD version of mip6d or the  
>>> latest
>>>  version?
>>>  Is there any means to realize it?
>>>
>>> => as far as I know there was only one implementation and
>>> no plan to make it available... but some knew where to find it
>>> (and I am still in the list).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr
>>>
>>> PS: as usual the support is at 100% in the MIPv6 side (i.e., IPsec/ 
>>> IKE
>>> is standard).
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Support mailing list
>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>