[support] Problem in using racoon in the live CD

liu jianwei ljw725 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 27 09:56:24 JST 2008


It only mentions RO, but the payload in the MN-CN transport mode communication.
Does it support the IPSec for payload of MN-CN transport mode?

2008/12/27 Romain KUNTZ <kuntz at lsiit.u-strasbg.fr>:
> According to the table below, IPsec seems to work in transport mode for the
> CN:
> http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/index.html.en#ISSUES
>
> but I don't have any example configuration.
>
> romain
>
> On 2008/12/26, at 15:26, liu jianwei wrote:
>
>> There is no IPSec description in the CN section of the document you
>> provide: http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/index.html.en#CONFIG-IPSEC
>> So, you mean it curretly does not support CN-MN IPSec?
>>
>> 2008/12/26 Romain KUNTZ <kuntz at lsiit.u-strasbg.fr>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You may find some pieces of information on this page:
>>> http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> romain
>>>
>>> On 2008/12/26, at 3:11, liu jianwei wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dose CN support IPSec now (for any edition of mip6d)?
>>>> Can I use IPSec policy in the mip6d.conf like that in HA?
>>>> if not, could anyone give me some hints on the implementation of this?
>>>> by the way, is there any documentation introducing all the available
>>>> options in the IPSec policy section of mip6d.conf (and the
>>>> grammar,such as UseESP, UseAH? Can Mh and TunnelMh use together?).
>>>>
>>>> 2008/5/4 liu jianwei <ljw725 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> In your previous mail you wrote:
>>>>> but some knew where to find it
>>>>> =>Where could I find it? :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/5/1, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In your previous mail you wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I read from the Readme.IPsec that
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "(2) IPsec between the MN and CN -- Currently, use of IPsec between MN
>>>>>>   and CN is not supported."
>>>>>> Is this feature supported by the Live CD version of mip6d or the
>>>>>> latest
>>>>>> version?
>>>>>> Is there any means to realize it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> => as far as I know there was only one implementation and
>>>>>> no plan to make it available... but some knew where to find it
>>>>>> (and I am still in the list).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS: as usual the support is at 100% in the MIPv6 side (i.e., IPsec/IKE
>>>>>> is standard).
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Support mailing list
>>>>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>>>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Support mailing list
>>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Support mailing list
>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support mailing list
>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>



More information about the Support mailing list