[support] Problem in using racoon in the live CD

[liu jianwei]

Are there anyone thinking about transplanting the mip6d code into the
kernel? Could anyone give me some reasons of NOT doing so? What are
the main difficulties of doing so?

2008/12/27 Romain KUNTZ <kuntz at lsiit.u-strasbg.fr>:
> According to the table below, IPsec seems to work in transport mode for the
> CN:
> http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/index.html.en#ISSUES
>
> but I don't have any example configuration.
>
> romain
>
> On 2008/12/26, at 15:26, liu jianwei wrote:
>
>> There is no IPSec description in the CN section of the document you
>> provide: http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/index.html.en#CONFIG-IPSEC
>> So, you mean it curretly does not support CN-MN IPSec?
>>
>> 2008/12/26 Romain KUNTZ <kuntz at lsiit.u-strasbg.fr>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You may find some pieces of information on this page:
>>> http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> romain
>>>
>>> On 2008/12/26, at 3:11, liu jianwei wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dose CN support IPSec now (for any edition of mip6d)?
>>>> Can I use IPSec policy in the mip6d.conf like that in HA?
>>>> if not, could anyone give me some hints on the implementation of this?
>>>> by the way, is there any documentation introducing all the available
>>>> options in the IPSec policy section of mip6d.conf (and the
>>>> grammar,such as UseESP, UseAH? Can Mh and TunnelMh use together?).
>>>>
>>>> 2008/5/4 liu jianwei <ljw725 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> In your previous mail you wrote:
>>>>> but some knew where to find it
>>>>> =>Where could I find it? :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/5/1, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In your previous mail you wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I read from the Readme.IPsec that
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "(2) IPsec between the MN and CN -- Currently, use of IPsec between MN
>>>>>>   and CN is not supported."
>>>>>> Is this feature supported by the Live CD version of mip6d or the
>>>>>> latest
>>>>>> version?
>>>>>> Is there any means to realize it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> => as far as I know there was only one implementation and
>>>>>> no plan to make it available... but some knew where to find it
>>>>>> (and I am still in the list).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS: as usual the support is at 100% in the MIPv6 side (i.e., IPsec/IKE
>>>>>> is standard).
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Support mailing list
>>>>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>>>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Support mailing list
>>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Support mailing list
>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support mailing list
>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>