[support] Problem in using racoon in the live CD

[Romain KUNTZ]

On 2008/12/27, at 1:56, liu jianwei wrote:
> It only mentions RO, but the payload in the MN-CN transport mode  
> communication.
> Does it support the IPSec for payload of MN-CN transport mode?

What it says is that RO is working over transport mode IPsec.
You may want to ask more configuration details on the USAGI users ML:
http://www.linux-ipv6.org/ml/index.html#usagi-users

Regards,
romain


> 2008/12/27 Romain KUNTZ <kuntz at lsiit.u-strasbg.fr>:
>> According to the table below, IPsec seems to work in transport mode  
>> for the
>> CN:
>> http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/index.html.en#ISSUES
>>
>> but I don't have any example configuration.
>>
>> romain
>>
>> On 2008/12/26, at 15:26, liu jianwei wrote:
>>
>>> There is no IPSec description in the CN section of the document you
>>> provide: http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/index.html.en#CONFIG-IPSEC
>>> So, you mean it curretly does not support CN-MN IPSec?
>>>
>>> 2008/12/26 Romain KUNTZ <kuntz at lsiit.u-strasbg.fr>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> You may find some pieces of information on this page:
>>>> http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> romain
>>>>
>>>> On 2008/12/26, at 3:11, liu jianwei wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dose CN support IPSec now (for any edition of mip6d)?
>>>>> Can I use IPSec policy in the mip6d.conf like that in HA?
>>>>> if not, could anyone give me some hints on the implementation of  
>>>>> this?
>>>>> by the way, is there any documentation introducing all the  
>>>>> available
>>>>> options in the IPSec policy section of mip6d.conf (and the
>>>>> grammar,such as UseESP, UseAH? Can Mh and TunnelMh use together?).
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/5/4 liu jianwei <ljw725 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In your previous mail you wrote:
>>>>>> but some knew where to find it
>>>>>> =>Where could I find it? :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2008/5/1, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In your previous mail you wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I read from the Readme.IPsec that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "(2) IPsec between the MN and CN -- Currently, use of IPsec  
>>>>>>> between MN
>>>>>>>  and CN is not supported."
>>>>>>> Is this feature supported by the Live CD version of mip6d or the
>>>>>>> latest
>>>>>>> version?
>>>>>>> Is there any means to realize it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> => as far as I know there was only one implementation and
>>>>>>> no plan to make it available... but some knew where to find it
>>>>>>> (and I am still in the list).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PS: as usual the support is at 100% in the MIPv6 side (i.e.,  
>>>>>>> IPsec/IKE
>>>>>>> is standard).
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Support mailing list
>>>>>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>>>>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Support mailing list
>>>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Support mailing list
>>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Support mailing list
>>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support mailing list
>> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
>> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at ml.nautilus6.org
> http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support
>