[support] DAD Delay too high?

support at adhari.de support at adhari.de
Tue Sep 29 18:47:46 JST 2009


Hi arno, Thanks for taking out time for so much  support from your side.


the tipp with the Radvd Version was good,  I measured better values in the Router discovery delay. 
 
But the DAD Delay, I still have the same Problem. I made new 450 tests and had again an average of 2,95 seconds between the first NSsent and the BU.
 
Any other Ideas?
 
 
Hakim
 
 
 
-----UrsprünglicheNachricht-----
Hi,
 
support at adhari.de writes:
 
> I performed the same tests on a fresh installedSystem (debian /kernel 2.6.31)
> Only MIP6 Support without NEMO or MCOA patches.Istill have too high
> DAD delays (delay between the first NeighborhoodSolicitation and the
> HomeAgent registration.) 
> 
> I made about 300 tests and had an average value of2,95 seconds.
> 
> Look at this case for example:The first Neighborsolicitation was sent
> at time 12.556429 and the Binding update more than 3seconds later at
> 15.920365 
> 
> Any Idea?
 
Maybe. Are you using Debian unstable radvd > 1.2(probably 1.3) which is
broken. See the discussion here:
 
http://lists.litech.org/pipermail/radvd-devel-l/2009-July/thread.html
 
> 00:59:10.856905 fe80::201:2ff:fe1a:d2be ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:10.859420           :: ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast ListenerReport Message v2
> 00:59:10.947435           :: ->ff02::2      ICMPv6 Router solicitation
> 00:59:10.948423           :: ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast ListenerReport Message v2
> 00:59:11.369853 2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000 ICMPv6 Echo request
> 00:59:11.370763 2001:a:b::1000 ->2001:a:b::1  ICMPv6 Echo reply
> 00:59:11.528376           :: ->ff02::1:ff1d:b521 ICMPv6Neighbor solicitation
> 00:59:12.454521           :: ->ff02::2      ICMPv6 Router solicitation
> 00:59:12.537394 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:12.537802 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:12.538302 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 -> ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:12.538851 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:12.539392           :: ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast ListenerReport Message v2
> 00:59:12.539418 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:12.556429           :: ->ff02::1:ff1d:b521 ICMPv6Neighbor solicitation
> 00:59:12.630719           :: ->ff02::2      ICMPv6 Router solicitation
> 00:59:13.148431           :: ->ff02::1:ff1d:b521 ICMPv6 Neighborsolicitation
> 00:59:13.370432 2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000 ICMPv6 Echo request
> 00:59:13.618430 fe80::216:6fff:fe1d:b521 ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast ListenerReport Messagev2
> 00:59:14.370462 2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000 ICMPv6 Echo request
> 00:59:15.370475 2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000 ICMPv6 Echo request
> 00:59:15.916589 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:15.917068 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:15.917439 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:15.917936 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
> 00:59:15.918380           :: ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast ListenerReport Message v2
> 00:59:15.920365 2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000 MIPv6 Binding Update
 
In fact, the BU is triggered 0.01 sec after receiving theRA (one in
the set of 4 RA).
 
I was hit by that same bug last week. I reinstalleddowngraded my radvd
to version 1.2.
 
Cheers,
 
a+
 
-----UrsprünglicheNachricht-----
Von: support-bounces at jules.nautilus6.org[mailto:support-bounces at jules.nautilus6.org] Im Auftrag von support at adhari.de
Gesendet: Montag, 21. September 2009 09:51
An: support at jules.nautilus6.org; arno at natisbad.org
Cc: faqir.yousaf at uni-dortmund.de
Betreff: [support] DAD Delay too high?
 
Hi Arnaud,
I performed the same tests on a fresh installed System(debian   /kernel 2.6.31)
Only MIP6 Support without NEMO or MCOA patches.I stillhave too high DAD delays (delay between the first Neighborhood Solicitation andthe HomeAgent registration.)
 
 I made about 300 tests and had an average value of2,95 seconds.
 
 Look at this case for example:The first Neighborsolicitation was sent at time 12.556429 and the Binding update more than 3seconds later at 15.920365  
 
Any Idea? 
 
Merci beaucoup
 
 Hakim  
 
 
 
00:59:10.856905 fe80::201:2ff:fe1a:d2be ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:10.859420          :: ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast ListenerReportMessage v2
00:59:10.947435          :: ->ff02::2      ICMPv6 Router solicitation
00:59:10.948423          :: ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast ListenerReportMessage v2
00:59:11.369853  2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000ICMPv6 Echo request
00:59:11.370763 2001:a:b::1000 -> 2001:a:b::1 ICMPv6 Echo reply
00:59:11.528376          :: ->ff02::1:ff1d:b521 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
00:59:12.454521          :: ->ff02::2      ICMPv6 Router solicitation
00:59:12.537394 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:12.537802 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:12.538302 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:12.538851 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:12.539392          :: ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast ListenerReportMessage v2
00:59:12.539418 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:12.556429          :: ->ff02::1:ff1d:b521 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
00:59:12.630719          :: ->ff02::2      ICMPv6 Router solicitation
00:59:13.148431          :: ->ff02::1:ff1d:b521 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
00:59:13.370432  2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000ICMPv6 Echo request
00:59:13.618430 fe80::216:6fff:fe1d:b521 ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast Listener Report Messagev2
00:59:14.370462  2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000ICMPv6 Echo request
00:59:15.370475  2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000ICMPv6 Echo request
00:59:15.916589 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:15.917068 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:15.917439 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:15.917936 fe80::201:2ff:fea7:a651 ->ff02::1      ICMPv6 Router advertisement
00:59:15.918380          :: ->ff02::16     ICMPv6 Multicast ListenerReportMessage v2
00:59:15.920365  2001:a:b::1 ->2001:a:b::1000MIPv6 Binding Update
 
 
 
 
   I adjusted my configurationfiles Here aremy configuration files: 
 
 
 
*********MobileNode*************
 
--------mip6d.conf:----------
 
   NodeConfig MN;
   DebugLevel 10;
   DoRouteOptimizationCN disabled;
   DoRouteOptimizationMN disabled;
   UseCnBuAck disabled;
 
   OptimisticHandoff disabled;
   MnRouterProbes 0;
   MnRouterProbeTimeout 0.02;
   MnMaxHaBindingLife 60;
 
  Interface "eth1" { 
MnIfPreference 1;   
  }
 
   MnHomeLink "eth1" {
       HomeAgentAddress 2001:a:b:0::1000;
        HomeAddress2001:a:b:0::1/64(2001:a:b:1::/64);  }
 
   UseMnHaIPsec disabled;
   KeyMngMobCapability disabled;
 
 
 
 
*********HomeAgent*************
 
--------mip6d.conf:----------
 
   NodeConfig HA;
   DebugLevel 10;
   Interface "eth1";
   UseMnHaIPsec disabled;
   KeyMngMobCapability disabled;
 
--------Radvd.conf----------
 
   interface eth1
   {
        AdvSendAdverton;
       MaxRtrAdvInterval 0.07;
       MinRtrAdvInterval 0.03;
        AdvIntervalOpton;
       AdvHomeAgentFlag on;
       AdvHomeAgentInfo on;
       HomeAgentLifetime 1800;
       HomeAgentPreference 10;
       AdvMobRtrSupportFlag on;
        prefix2001:a:b:0::1000/64
        {
               AdvRouterAddr on;
               AdvOnLink on;
               AdvAutonomous on;
        };
   };
 
 
 
*********ForeignRouter************* (the MN tryes toconnect to this Router)
 
--------Radvd.conf----------
 
   interface eth3
   {
        AdvSendAdverton;
       MaxRtrAdvInterval 0.07;
       MinRtrAdvInterval 0.03;
        AdvIntervalOpton;
        prefix2001:a:f2:1::1/64
        {
               AdvRouterAddr on;
               AdvOnLink on;
               AdvAutonomous on;
        };
   };
   
 Hi,
 
support at adhari.de writes:
 
> Hi Arnaud,
> 
> I´m not sure if this problem have something to dowith the
> DADRetransTimer. But I don´t know where to checkthis setting in order
> to exclude this possibilty. 
> 
> Here are my configuration files: 
> 
> *********MobileNode*************
> 
> --------mip6d.conf:----------
> 
>    NodeConfigMN;
>    DebugLevel 10;
>   DoRouteOptimizationCN disabled;
>   DoRouteOptimizationMN disabled;
>    UseCnBuAckdisabled;
> 
>   OptimisticHandoff disabled;
>   MnRouterProbes 0;
>   MnRouterProbeTimeout 0.02;
>   MnMaxHaBindingLife 60;
> 
>   Interface"eth1" { 
>           Bid 100; 
>     BidPriority10;
>     Reliabletrue;
 
MCoA patch applied? Can you try w/o it to see if this isrelated?
 
a+
 
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support at ml.nautilus6.org
http://ml.nautilus6.org/mailman/listinfo/support



More information about the Support mailing list